Friday, June 29, 2018

leftovers: the plausibility of the alternative fact

Medicine has undergone this kind of change over the years decades centuries as well. For the most part, people know what the healthiest behaviors are... and yet... there are always those who have a different approach. It just comes down to the same thing - one side has the facts but doesn't explain well enough while the other side has no facts but remains completely plausible.

I suppose doctors today deal with the 'challenge' of informed patients in a way their peers from the past would be unable to relate to. If I feel sick or hurt, I don't stumble down to the doctor's office for a consult - I go straight to the internet and lookup my symptoms. Here’s something I couldn’t have said to a doctor in 1995:
Hey doc, ‘ow ah ya? My foot hurt and I either sprained it or have chronic depression. Oh, and can we run a blood test on it, just in case I have metacarpal cancer? Say what? Oh, right, metatarsal, sure, but can we check that, ya know, since my friend on the internet said...
It’s a stunner WebMD doesn’t give out referrals, honestly.

I suspect doctors are not too thrilled about patients coming in after self-diagnosing themselves with three terminal illnesses after misreading the symptoms of a shellfish allergy. But it might just be the growing pains needed to achieve a healthier future. A lot of debilitating conditions are chronic and their effects can be better controlled if caught early on in life. A population able to convince itself of the need to go see the doctor – even if it is based on a false self-diagnosis at whoknowswhat.com – is probably going to be healthier than one where people are used to saying... ah... this weird bumpy thing... it’s probably nothing… a pint of red wine should take care of it...